Review Form
Dear respective reviewers of the ijte,
Please download this form for reviewing the manuscript.
All authors could see the review form in order to prepare the manuscripts well.
|
International Journal of TESOL & Education (IJTE) ISSN: 2768-4563 | i-jte.org Peer Review Form |
Manuscript Information
|
Manuscript Title |
|
|
Manuscript ID |
|
|
Reviewer Name |
|
|
Reviewer Affiliation |
|
|
Date of Review |
|
Conflict of Interest Declaration
Before proceeding, please confirm that you have no conflict of interest with the authors or content of this manuscript. A conflict of interest includes personal, professional, financial, or collaborative relationships that could compromise the objectivity of your review. If a conflict exists, please decline this review and notify the Editor immediately.
|
☐ |
I confirm that I have no conflict of interest with the authors or content of this manuscript and am able to provide an objective review. |
|
☐ |
I have a potential conflict of interest. I am notifying the Editor and declining this review. |
Evaluation Checklist
Please evaluate each criterion using the scale: Yes = fully met | Partially = partially met or needs improvement | No = not met | N/A = not applicable to this study.
|
Evaluation Criterion |
Yes |
Partially |
No |
N/A |
|
Title & Abstract |
||||
|
The title accurately and concisely reflects the content and scope of the manuscript. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
The abstract clearly states the purpose, method, key findings, and significance of the study. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
The abstract is within the required word limit (120–150 words). |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Keywords are appropriate and relevant to the field. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Introduction & Literature Review |
||||
|
The introduction clearly establishes the research context and significance of the study. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
The purpose, aims, or research questions of the study are explicitly and clearly stated. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
The literature review is comprehensive, up-to-date, and critically synthesized. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
The study identifies a clear research gap that justifies the current work. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Citations are appropriate, relevant, and follow APA 7th edition format. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Methodology |
||||
|
The research design is appropriate to the stated research questions or objectives. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Participant/data source selection and sampling procedures are described clearly. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Data collection instruments and procedures are sufficiently detailed for replication. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Data analysis methods are clearly described and appropriate to the data and research questions. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Reliability, validity, trustworthiness, or other quality criteria are addressed adequately. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Ethical procedures (participant consent, confidentiality, ethics approval) are reported where applicable. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Results / Findings |
||||
|
The results/findings are presented clearly and systematically. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Results/findings directly address the stated research questions or objectives. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Tables, figures, and charts are clearly labeled, appropriately formatted, and add value. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Sufficient detail is provided to allow readers to assess the validity of the findings. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Discussion |
||||
|
The discussion interprets findings in relation to the research questions. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
The discussion situates findings in the context of existing literature. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Alternative explanations or limitations of the findings are considered. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Implications for theory, pedagogy, or practice in TESOL/education are addressed. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Conclusion |
||||
|
The conclusion accurately summarizes the main findings and contributions. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Limitations of the study are clearly acknowledged. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Recommendations for future research are relevant and grounded in the findings. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Language & Presentation |
||||
|
The manuscript is written in clear, accurate, and professional academic English. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
The manuscript is well-organized and demonstrates coherent argumentation throughout. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
The manuscript adheres to the IJTE template and formatting requirements. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
The reference list is complete, accurate, and formatted in APA 7th edition. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
Ethics & Originality |
||||
|
The study appears to be original and makes a meaningful contribution to the field. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
The manuscript includes a Compliance with Ethical Standards section with relevant disclosures. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|
There are no apparent concerns about plagiarism, data fabrication, or redundant publication. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
Overall Assessment
|
Rate the overall quality of this manuscript (tick one): |
|||||
|
☐ Excellent |
☐ Very Good |
☐ Good |
☐ Fair |
☐ Poor |
☐ Very Poor |
Editorial Recommendation
|
Editorial Recommendation |
|
|
☐ Accept as submitted The manuscript is suitable for publication with no or only minor typographical corrections. ☐ Minor Revision The manuscript requires small revisions that do not necessitate re-review. Author responses should be submitted with the revised manuscript. ☐ Major Revision The manuscript requires substantial revision. The revised manuscript will be re-evaluated before a final decision is made. |
☐ Reject and Resubmit The manuscript has potential but requires fundamental restructuring or additional research. Authors may resubmit as a new submission. ☐ Reject The manuscript does not meet the journal's standards for publication and is not suitable for resubmission. ☐ Refer to Editor (with comments) The reviewer has concerns that require editorial judgment before a recommendation can be made. |
Detailed Comments by Section
Please provide specific, constructive feedback for each section. Where possible, refer to page or line numbers. Feedback should be clear and respectful, aimed at helping authors improve the quality of their work.
|
Section |
Reviewer Comments (be specific; refer to page/line numbers where possible) |
|
Title & Abstract |
|
|
Introduction & Literature Review |
|
|
Methodology |
|
|
Results / Findings |
|
|
Discussion |
|
|
Conclusion |
|
|
Language & Presentation |
|
|
Ethics, Originality & Other Issues |
|
|
Confidential Comments to the Editor (not shared with authors) |
|
Reviewer Declaration
By completing this form, I confirm that my review is objective, confidential, and conducted in accordance with IJTE's reviewer responsibilities as outlined on the journal's Standards & Responsibilities page.
|
Reviewer Name (Typed)
|
Signature
|
Date
|
Thank you for your contribution to the peer review process of IJTE. Your careful and constructive review is greatly valued.
